Bottom line: mono is more costly to produce, but has higher productivity per square meter. Poly advantages are the inverse. The article below is a good basic primer.
https://solarjuice.com/blog/pv-panels/monocrystalline-vs-polycrystalline/
ArcStar Energy Information Broadcaster & Archive.
Bottom line: mono is more costly to produce, but has higher productivity per square meter. Poly advantages are the inverse. The article below is a good basic primer.
https://solarjuice.com/blog/pv-panels/monocrystalline-vs-polycrystalline/
No comments:
Post a Comment