Wednesday, December 26, 2012
Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Bloomberg News, sent from my Android phone
The U.S. may be a "bright spot" for the global economy in 2013, with Europe and Japan "not optimistic," said the official who oversees day-to-day management of China's $3.3 trillion foreign exchange reserves.
Credit expansion and the development of the alternative energy industry will help make the U.S. "the major power promoting global economic growth in the future," said Huang Guobo, director of the foreign exchange reserves management department at China's State Administration of Foreign Ex [...]
Find out more about Bloomberg for Android: http://m.bloomberg.com/android
Friday, December 21, 2012
WTO confirms that Ontario's local content requirement violates trade rules
Friday, December 14, 2012
Solar Power Prices to Continue Falling Through 2025
Fri, 12/14/2012 - 9:37am
Get today's design engineering headlines and news - Sign up now!
As the total amount of solar modules produced has increased over the past few decades (from left to right), the price per watt has also fallen. Prices 1975-2009 are from Nemet (2009), and prices for 2010 and 2011 are based on data from Navigant and Bloomberg New Energy Finance. Red circles indicate the expectations from Near Zero's survey, for solar module prices at 300 GW and 600 GW of total installations (also called cumulative capacity). Also shown for reference in blue is the module price target of the Department of Energy's SunShot Program. Credit: Near Zero
A new survey of experts argues that solar power will become much cheaper through 2025, while expanding greatly—but for these trends to continue for the long term, will require a commitment to funding research.
Prices for solar modules—the part of solar panels that produce electricity—will continue to fall, in line with the long-term trend since 1980, according to a survey of experts by Near Zero, , a nonprofit energy research organization. However, for prices to keep falling for the long term will require continued committment to research, such as on materials used for making solar modules.
To get a sense of what future prices for solar power are likely to be, as well as other challenges and bottlenecks that the industry faces, Near Zero conducted a formal, quantitative survey (an "expert elicitation") that drew on from industry, universities, and national labs. Such surveys are a means of formally collecting expert judgments on a topic. By aggregating forecasts made independently by a variety of experts, the results reflect the collective wisdom of the group about how the solar power industry is most likely to develop, and also help to characterize the range of uncertainty about the future.
The survey asked experts for their expectations about future prices for modules as well as the expenditures for other parts of solar power systems, known as "balance of system" expenses. The experts were also asked how much solar power they expected would be installed in the coming years.
The experts expected the price of solar power systems will fall sufficiently that it will be far more competitive than it is today. The experts forecast a large expansion of the amount of installed solar power, increasing more than 10 times over the decade from 2010 to 2020, an expansion that will continue at a similar rate until at least 2025.
However, this success story is dependent on solar power prices continuing to fall, which will require continued and possibly increased levels of spending on research and development, the experts said. If solar power prices continue to fall as expected in the survey, then the large expansion of installed solar power could be achieved while requiring spending less each year than the world currently is spending on solar power installations. But if prices were to hold steady rather than falling, then the same expansion of solar power, over the period 2012 to 2025, would cost at least 50% more—adding up to several hundred billion dolla
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
Fwd: Statement by Minister Bentley on Final Report from the Ontario Distribution Sector Review Panel
From: Ontario News <email@example.com>
Date: Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:33 AM
Subject: Statement by Minister Bentley on Final Report from the Ontario Distribution Sector Review Panel
Sunday, December 9, 2012
Friday, December 7, 2012
Renewables Account for 46% New US Electrical Generating Capacity Since January | Renewable Energy News Article
No bids on PPC tender for 200 MW PV plant in Greece
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Sky Solar obtains authorization for 48 MW solar project in Brazil
US Department of Energy seeks to increase renewable energy production on American Indian lands
Wednesday, December 5, 2012
NREL publishes reports on US solar pricing trends, PV system soft costs
Module prices will continue to decline despite increased demand from emerging markets
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Canadian Solar secures $139 million to finance construction of 49 MW in Ontario
Monday, December 3, 2012
Lefties never know when to stop.
Bloomberg News, sent from my Android phone
Jean-Emile Rosenblum, a 34-year-old e-commerce businessman, is quitting France.
With President Francois Hollande’s government readying a vote this month on its first annual budget law that seeks to raise 24.4 billion euros ($31.7 billion) in additional taxes, some of France’s entrepreneurs and wealthy are heading for the door. Hollande’s hitting businesses and individuals with at least a dozen new measures, including a 75 percent levy on income of more than 1 million euros, to narrow the budget gap.
“France is no longer a sexy place to be,” said Rosenblum, founder and former owner of Pixmania, an online seller of computers. “To attract and keep business and jobs you have to put on your best face, especially in tough economic times. With all the costs, the taxes and the social pressure, France looks more like an old maid to me.”
Rosenblum -- who says he’s leaving France with his wife and two little children this month to open a new business in a country he won’t disclose -- is among people fleeing a slew of levies announced by Hollande since the Socialist president was elected in May. The 75 percent millionaire tax was followed by new levies on capital gains, an increased tax on income and wealth, a boost to inheritance charges and an exit tax for entrepreneurs selling their companies.
The weight of the levies is prompting a wave of departures, said Philippe Kenel, Geneva-based tax lawyer at Python, Schifferli, Peter & Associates.
“It’s impossible to measure yet how many people are leaving or have left as no one wants to go public,” Kenel said. “But frankly, I’ve doubled the number of relocations this year with a sharp increase since Hollande unveiled his new fiscal rules in September. Retirees go to Switzerland. Entrepreneurs go to Belgium or to London.”
The government is seeking to bolster revenue through taxes on large companies, Internet startups and private fortunes to make its budget-deficit target of 3 percent of gross domestic product next year. Hollande, the first Socialist president in France since 1995, has called on those “with the most to show patriotism” in tough economic times.
C’est trop, some Frenchmen are saying.
“Those leaving will save so much in taxes that it’s impossible to refuse to go,” said Francois de la Villardiere, a former local politician and businessman, who sold his stake in an advertising company he co-founded to Publicis SA. (PUB) He is disposing of his Paris residence and his vacation home near the Rambouillet forest outside the French capital, before moving to somewhere in Europe or the Americas.
“The new tax system is a call from the government to break the law,” de la Villardiere said. “I have nothing against paying my share of the burden or being ‘patriotic’ as Hollande calls it, but when all you do is pay taxes, you hit a ceiling.”
While the trickling out of French people began when former President Nicolas Sarkozy started increasing levies and went back on a measure that capped all taxes at 50 percent of income, it’s Hollande’s fiscal regime that has accelerated departures. [bn:URL=http://www.portaildudeveloppementcommercial.com/users/didier-delmer-1.html]
Didier Delmer , who helps French entrepreneurs relocate and create companies in London, says his business has skyrocketed, from five transfers a month to an average 80 since May 2012.
U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron promised in June to roll out the “red carpet” for fleeing French people. Unlike France, the U.K. has no wealth tax. Also, while Hollande is creating a new 45 percent income tax for earnings above 150,000 euros a year to add about 700 million euros to the government’s coffers, the U.K. cut the 50 percent tax rate for income over 150,000 pounds ($242,500) to 45 percent from April.
Delmer, who founded Business Booster Ltd. 12 years ago, said his clients include only about two or three millionaires a month. Most of them are young French entrepreneurs who want to get away from their country’s stifling business climate, he said.
“They want to escape France’s tax red-tape, escape the crappy attitude toward those who are successful, get lower corporate taxes and be in a place with a better reputation than Paris,” he said.
They are the kind of people France needs at home to create jobs as it grapples with an unemployment rate that’s at a 14- year high.
“Hollande has created a system where profits, wealth and most of the money gets sucked up by the state to fund bottomless public finances,” de la Villardiere said. “Instead of looking for creative, new options to spur growth, they went with old recipes that have reached their limit.”
Rosenblum, who sold the last of his shares in Pixmania to Dixons Retail Plc (DXNS) in July, says most of the 250 jobs his new business will create will be outside France.
“And that’s unfortunate,” he said.
Hollande’s plan to double the top capital-gains tax to about 64 percent for entrepreneurs selling their business, provoked an outcry. It also spawned in October an entrepreneurs’ group dubbed “Les Pigeons,” who used the bird’s role in French slang as the “sucker” to show they were being made the fall guys for France’s economic woes.
As the group rallied thousands of protesters, Finance Minister Pierre Moscovici met with them, and less than two weeks after unveiling the bill, Hollande watered down the plan and maintained an “exit tax” determined by the period of time a stake is held and whether proceeds from a sale are reinvested.
“The measure on capital gains was a direct attack on the motors of entrepreneurship, the aspiration to make money in case of success, which is necessary for taking risks,” said Philippe Marini, the Senate Finance Committee president and member of the opposition Union for Popular Movement party.
Exactly how the new capital-gains tax will work remains unclear. The 75 percent tax was also modified. After first leaving it open-ended, Hollande said the tax would only last two years. The tax, which was supposed to include bonuses and dividends, is now limited to the base salary.
Some of the details on the levies will be clearer after the budget law is voted in. It will be debated and voted on in the Senate until Dec. 11 and in the National Assembly by Dec. 20.
“The uncertainty surrounding Hollande’s first budget law, the moving target with changing tax rates on capital gains, and the general signal that it sends: ‘if you make money we’ll take it’ is very stressful,” said Charles-Marie Jottras who heads the luxury real estate company Daniel Feau in Paris. “Instead of waiting to get slapped, they leave.”
The 75 percent tax, announced primarily to appease Hollande’s political base during the election campaign, may raise only a few dozen million euros.
“The rate is so outrageous and we see so many top earners leaving that I doubt there will be many left to pay it,” said Jottras. “It’s the Laffer curve: too much taxation kills taxes.”
Jottras, who also works with the Christie’s real estate network, says he already has evidence of people leaving in the top-end property market. He has 30 percent more high-end homes for sale in France now than in March, when Hollande first mentioned the new levy on the campaign trail. Jottras sells homes that cost 1.5 million euros or more.
Nathalie Garcin, daughter of Emile Garcin, the founder of the eponymous luxury property firm, said she has seen a doubling of Paris homes valued at between 3 million euros and 15 million euros being put up for sale.
“The first thing lawyers tell those who want to leave France is to sell their primary residence, ” she said in an interview. “My clients tell me they’re fed up and don’t want to work for the state. All this is temporary, I hope.”
To be sure, not all wealthy people are planning to leave. Matthieu Pigasse, deputy chief executive officer of investment bank Lazard Ltd. (LAZ), told French magazine Challenges that he’s not going anywhere.
“They’re exceptional measures for an exceptional crisis,” he told the magazine. “I’m showing solidarity.”
Also, only half those who get in touch with tax lawyers or relocation consultants actually make the final move, Python, Schifferli’s Kenel said. Language barriers, homesickness, food, family and social life are often strong incentives to abandon a move, he said.
Additionally, the stigma attached to leaving for tax reasons also keeps people from acting.
A decision by France’s richest man, LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SA (MC) Chief Executive Officer Bernard Arnault, to seek Belgian citizenship created a media frenzy over tax exiles, prompting the newspaper Liberation to run a front-page headline that read: “Get lost, rich bastard.”
Arnault had to quickly come out and say that he plans to retain his local residence and will continue to pay French taxes.
French citizens aren’t the only ones seeking to escape the country’s new tax regime. Steve Horton, who runs an eponymous tax service company in Paris to advise Americans in France, says the state has lost 7 million euros in receipts for next year from such taxpayers. First Sarkozy and now Hollande have taken tax decisions that create collateral damage, he said.
“France can hardly compete now with Moscow, New York and other capital cities for elite workers,” Horton said. “They are skilled, speak many languages and are mobile. They were sad to leave but they are gone now. France has killed the goose that laid golden eggs.”
To contact the reporters on this story: Helene Fouquet in Paris at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Vidya Root at email@example.com
Find out more about Bloomberg for Android: http://m.bloomberg.com/android
Bloomberg News, sent from my Android phone
The four windmills dug into northern Canada’s tundra that power Rio Tinto Group (RIO)’s $5.2 billion Diavik diamond mine are the world’s first designed to work in gusts as cold as 40 degrees below zero.
The mining company has sunk $30 million into wind energy because roads are frozen and closed to diesel fuel deliveries for 10 months a year. Near the opposite pole, in Argentina, Barrick Gold Corp. (ABX) is testing the highest wind turbine at 4,100 meters (13,450 feet), an altitude almost halfway up Mt. Everest. The machine was designed for low air density and provides 20 percent of a Barrick gold mine’s power on windy days.
“All the big mining companies are studying different types of renewables,” Gil Forer, Ernst & Young LLP’s clean-tech head in New York, said in an interview. They are “very strategic” for an energy-intensive industry, he said.
Gold and diamonds often are found where no power cables exist, particularly at the planet’s extremes where winds are stronger. Mining companies are investing in renewable energy faster than other industries and will account for 1.8 percent of global clean-power spending this year, double the 0.9 percent rate in 2010, according to data compiled by Ernst & Young and Bloomberg. At the same time, they’re risking more production on weather, as cloud cover and still days can kill power supply.
The companies say it’s mostly driven by costs. Still, the gamble can improve a corporate image tarnished over decades by worker accidents, fouled rivers and toxic tailings in an industry that extracts gems and metals formed over millions of years.
“What makes this trend much more convincing is that it’s not a broader altruistic corporate motive” driving investment, said John Drexhage, climate change director at the International Council on Mining and Metals, whose 22 members include Anglo American Plc, BHP Billiton Ltd. (BHP) and Barrick. Instead, it’s regulatory pressures “and also the simple bottom line that renewables are helping to actually work as an effective means of helping to cut down both exposure and costs.”
Clean power provides about a third of the energy consumed by London-based Rio Tinto, the world’s second-biggest mining company. Rio, like most competitors, backs up the projects with fossil-fuel generation for when winds die and skies cloud over.
Anglo American, which owns 85 percent of De Beers, the biggest diamond producer, invested about $180 million in low- carbon technologies and gets 23 percent of its energy from clean sources. Newmont Mining Corp. (NEM), having spent about $171 million on hydropower, biodiesel and geothermal power in 2011, uses clean energy at 10 of its 14 mines, spokesman Omar Jabara said.
Explorers will invest about $5 billion in remote alternative-power projects this year and at least $8.4 billion by 2016, compared with $1.88 billion in 2010, Ernst & Young estimated, based on Pike Research data.
Rio Tinto’s Diavik mine, estimated to hold 60 million carats of diamonds, lies 220 kilometers (137 miles) south of the Arctic Circle in land that’s home to grizzly bears and wolves. Using wind energy there has cut its diesel use 10 percent and the number of tanker trucks braving frozen lakes and ponds by 100 a year, company spokesman David Outhwaite said. The economic payback time is about eight years, he said.
Energy used for crushing, grinding and hauling ores is usually one of the top three operating costs for mines, according to Mike Elliott, global mining and metals leader at Ernst & Young. For gold mines such as those controlled by Barrick and Goldcorp Inc. (G), it could be the largest single expense, he said.
Barrick last year got about 14 percent of its electricity from low-carbon sources. Energy accounts for about a quarter of its operating costs. The company owns a solar farm in Nevada and a 20-megawatt wind park in Chile that cost $50 million to build and provides enough energy to supply 10,000 homes. It’s also introducing solar panels at its mine facilities to power kitchens and other camp amenities.
“Competition for secure energy in areas where there is a rising standard of living in the population and therefore rising energy demand, means mining companies may find they aren’t able to access energy,” Elliott said. “In these situations they would be looking at a partial or fully self-sufficient energy supply from renewables.” Remote mines also provide the biggest opportunity for clean power, he said.
Countries such as South Africa and Chile, where energy grids are stretched to the limit, lend themselves to look at other options, Drexhage said. In the Republic of Congo, one of the largest diamond-producing countries, and in the Canadian Arctic where Rio operates as well as BHP and De Beers, diesel is relatively expensive, so biofuels are being considered.
Anglo American (AAL), Newmont and Barrick are investigating the potential of cleaner fuel. Anglo owns a minority stake in MBD Energy Ltd., an Australian company developing technology that uses algae to absorb flue gases from power stations to make products such as biofuel. Newmont uses biodiesel at its mines in Peru and to run its trucks and cut costs in Nevada. Barrick is experimenting with biodiesel in Africa and South America.
Newmont’s projects in Ghana are almost exclusively powered from hydroelectric facilities that are more cost-effective than gas-fired or diesel plants. For Anglo, hydro is a “major” part of its electricity mix in Brazil, where more than 80 percent of the power used at its operations comes from renewable sources. The company has also replaced charcoal with woodchips to account for 30 percent of its energy use at the Codemin plant in Brazil.
As the costs of solar energy come down, large mines present one of the biggest opportunities for solar-panel makers because they use diesel generators on-site, said Tom Werner, president and chief executive officer of SunPower Corp. It’s just the beginning of a market for the solar-panel maker majority owned by Total SA, which expects close to 100 megawatts a year of demand once the market ramps up, he said.
Rio Tinto has installed 20 solar-power plants across the world to study their potential, and Newmont is looking “very seriously” at using solar to cut costs and power its mines in the remote Australian desert. Goldcorp too is working on a feasibility study for a solar project in Nevada.
As much as 5 percent to 10 percent of SunPower’s business in the future could be for off-grid mine applications, Werner said. It’s technologically low risk and may be the “Trojan horse” for larger developments in countries where solar isn’t yet being used, he said.
While Rio Tinto hasn’t made direct investments in clean technology makers, it said it had a role to play in building a low-carbon infrastructure. The iron it mines is used in the production of wind turbines, and borates, a mineral mined in California, Europe and China, is used in turbine blades.
“The demand for natural resources is growing across the world so we need to develop new mines and be more efficient with existing mines, and future energy is one of the key issues,” Ernst & Young’s Forer said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Louise Downing in London at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Reed Landberg at email@example.com
Find out more about Bloomberg for Android: http://m.bloomberg.com/android
Friday, November 30, 2012
US energy department awards $14 million to eight disruptive solar research projects
Thursday, November 29, 2012
on AE and have had to resort to brute tactics to get what we need.
Largest wind farm in Canada commissioned in Quebec Social Media Tools More
Print Email Save
November 28, 2012
By PennEnergy Editorial Staff
Cartier Wind Energy announced the operation of its Gros-Morne Phase II wind
project, powered by 74 GE (NYSE: GE) 1.5-77 wind turbines and located in the
Gaspésie region of Québec. The amount of energy generated by the Gros-Morne
wind farm can power approximately 20,000 homes in the province of Québec.
Gros-Morne I and II combined is the largest wind farm in Canada with a total
output of 211.5 megawatts (MW).
GE is supplying 593, 1.5-77 wind turbines and associated services for wind
energy projects in Québec, including Gros-Morne. The projects were awarded
as part of Hydro-Québec's 2004 request for proposals (RFP) to supply the
province with 1,000 MW of new wind power capacity by 2012. GE's local supply
chain manufacturing and supplier partners have been integral to the
fulfillment of the province's local content requirements.
Hydro-Québec has purchased the energy under a 20-year power purchase
agreement. Cartier Wind Energy is a joint venture between TransCanada and
"Cartier énergie éolienne wishes to acknowledge the exemplary work by the GE
technicians in the success of the Gros-Morne-Sainte-Madeleine wind farm. You
have played an important role in order to deliver the wind farm around 25
days before the date of the commissioning contract with Hydro-Québec. This
result demonstrates your professionalism and your commitment," said Robert
Guillemette, CEO of Cartier Wind Energy.
The Gros-Morne project includes a four-year GE operations and maintenance
service contract with Cartier. GE has more than 50 wind technicians and
engineers in Canada providing expertise on parts, maintenance, upgrades and
long-term service contracts for a fleet of more than 1,400 units. The
company's regional wind services parts warehouse is located in Toronto for
fast and reliable distribution throughout the country.
"We have proven our ability to execute major projects with local content
requirements in Québec and are positioned for the upcoming 700-MW RFP
expected to be launched in 2013," said Guy Crepeau, region sales manager for
GE's renewable energy business in Canada. "We are committed to working with
developers, including Cartier, as we continue to develop advanced technology
to harness Canada's abundant wind resources."
Canada is among the world leaders in the production and use of renewable
energy. The country's installed wind base is set to nearly double by 2014,
to an expected 10 gigawatts of capacity.
For the most up to date and in-depth information on the Wind Generation
market visit PennEnergy's comprehensive Research area to access industry
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
11/26/2012 02:42 PM ShareThis
Massive Solar Tower Plant Greenlighted for Arizona
SolarReserve now has the green light to begin construction of its
biggest concentrating solar project (CSP) yet, a 150 megawatt (MW)
project in Arizona.
The Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County, Arizona unanimously approved
the permits for the Crossroads Solar Energy Project, which also includes 65
MW of solar PV.
The project will create more than 450 solar jobs during the two years
of construction and about 5000 direct and indirect jobs that affect the
supply chain and supporting activities.
Located on privately owned and actively cultivated land, the solar plant
will supply peak electricity to 100,000 homes in Arizona and California.
It's bigger than SolarReserve's flagship project, the 110 MW Crescent Dunes
Solar Energy Project in Nevada that's under construction. Both plants
are based around a solar tower that enables energy storage.
Cresent Dunes is the biggest solar tower project in the
world. The 540-foot tall solar tower is finished and the full project comes
online in 2013. That project has spurred sales in equipment, materials and
services across 20 states in the US.
SolarReserve's molten salt power tower technology allows 10 hours of solar
energy to be stored each day and released on demand, even after darkness.
That allows concentrating solar to completely replace conventional power
plants, such as coal , natural gas or nuclear.
Construction on Crossroads will begin late next year or in early 2014, with
projected commercial operation in 2016.
Founded in 2007, Santa Monica, California-based SolarReserve develops
large-scale concentrating solar projects and has a 4000 MW development
portfolio, mostly in the US and Europe. It recently started construction on
two 75 MW concentrating PV projects in South Africa, in one of the largest
renewable energy transactions in that country.
Learn more about the Crossroads project:
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
11/20/2012 04:08 PM ShareThis
California's Historic Carbon Auction: Results Are In
Last week, California held its first auction of greenhouse gas pollution
allowances, and the results are in.
Even though companies ended up paying just a few cents over the minimum
price for each ton of carbon, the state pulled in $290 million in revenue.
23.1 million allowances for 2013 were sold at $10.09 each - the minimum
price was $10. It also sold 14% of allowances for 2015.
Despite the low price paid, the auction demonstrated the start of a
competitive market, because all allowances for next year are sold out.
After the announcement of the auction results, some firms said they would
now be willing to invest in clean energy projects in the Golden State.
"This does make me want to invest more in California and send more of my
companies there," said Robert Day, partner at Black Coral Capital, a private
equity firm that focuses on the clean-tech and renewable-energy sectors.
350 companies participated in the auction, which own about 600 facilities in
To get the cap-and-trade program off the ground, California decided to
give 90% of allowances for free to polluters. If they exceed the carbon cap,
however, they will have to buy credits.
It's kind of amazing that $10 buys the right to emit one metric ton of
greenhouse gases, but as an example, cement maker CalPortland expects to
emit a million tons of greenhouse gases this year. A typical passenger
vehicle emits about 5 metric tons per year.
Learn more about California's cap-and-trade program:
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
11/06/2012 11:27 AM ShareThis
Be Alerted: ALEC Prioritizes Renewable Energy For Next Year
Regardless of who wins today's elections, conservative groups and their
fossil fuel industry backers will keep working to crush the renewable energy
industry. They will be greatly assisted, of course, if more Republicans win
elections on the state and federal levels.
ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council), the notorious right-wing group
that develops model legislation, which legislators then introduce across the
country, is launching an all-out effort to repeal state Renewable Portfolio
Standards (RPS) through model legislation, the "Electricity Freedom Act."
They plan to make repealing state RPSs a "high priority" for the coming
The bill is written and funded by an ALEC task force consisting of
representatives from major oil, gas and power companies, including BP,
Chevron, ExxonMobil, Koch, and Shell.
As most of you know, these standards - in place in 29 states and Wash DC -
require utilities to source a certain percentage of their energy from
renewables by a target date. The percentage varies depending on the state.
The RPS is among the most important methods for increasing the share of
renewable energy in the US.
ALEC says it opposes the concept of RPS because it is essentially a tax on
consumers and mandates some energy sources over others.
The bill says that wind and solar power are expensive and unreliable, and
that forcing utilities to use renewables threatens electric grid reliability
and will increase the cost of doing business through rate increases or
"Forcing business, industry, and ratepayers to use renewable energy through
a government mandate will increase the cost of doing business and push
companies to do business with other states or nations, thereby decreasing
American competitiveness," the bill states.
ALEC points to studies that claim electric rates will rise up to 37% by 2025
in Minnesota, for example, because of its RPS. Who conducted the study?
ALEC's right-wing sister organization, American Tradition Institute. Earlier
this year, a memo uncovered that group's planned national PR campaign to
turn public opinion against renewable energy.
This line of logic is false.
Studies find that state RPSs have not significantly affected electricity
rates between 2000-2010. Instead, these policies lead to cleaner air,
economic development, a more resilient electrical grid and greater resource
diversity, which reduces risk to consumers by not relying on any one energy
Actually, states with RPS report the costs of renewable energy are dropping.
In its annual report on the impact of Michigan's RPS (which voters may raise
today), the Michigan Public Service Commission said wind energy was almost a
third cheaper than buying electricity from a new coal plant. Utility Xcel
got a similar deal in Colorado.
ALEC's uses faulty assumptions. That "coal and natural gas prices will be
very low and stable over time, and they don't count any environmental
benefit to society from renewables," Richard Caperton from the Center for
American Progress told Midwest Energy News.
Minnesota's largest utilities say they would add wind power regardless of
the state's mandate, reports Midwest Energy News.
Although ALEC has lost a slew of corporate supporters this past year after
they were finally exposed, 2000 state lawmakers remain members. Among the
raft of right-wing legislation ALEC is responsible for are the voter
suppression laws that have taken hold across the country this year.
ALEC anti-environmental agenda includes dismantling state Renewable
Portfolio Standards, pressuring the EPA to designate palm oil as a renewable
fuel, pushing for loopholes in disclosure of natural gas fracking chemicals,
and killing regional climate cap-and-trade pacts, along with eliminating
clean air and water regulations, and even trying to turn public lands over
ALEC's goal is "to do one thing, and that's to maximize the profits of
fossil fuel industry and eliminate renewables from competition. I don't see
where the freedom is in that," warns Doug Klopp of Common Cause. Advocates
of renewable energy should be worried.
Read ALEC Exposed: Warming Up to Climate Change
Read ALEC Exposed: A Nationwide Blueprint for the Rightwing Takeover
Visit ALECexposed.org to learn more and find ALEC-influenced bills in your
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
Monday, November 26, 2012
First time in history for a foreigner in the post.
Friday, November 23, 2012
Thursday, November 22, 2012
PV grid parity will soon be the norm rather than the exception
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Monday, November 19, 2012
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Canadian Solar reports that its EPC subsidiary Canadian Solar Solutions has agreed to build and operate a 10 MW (AC) turnkey PV power plant in Ontario, Canada for independent power producer Penn Energy Renewables Ltd. This latest project brings the total EPC and O&M agreement between the two companies to 28.7 MW (AC). Construction of the 10 MW solar project is due to begin in the fourth quarter of 2012, with completion scheduled for the third quarter of 2013. The other 18.7 MW are due to come online by summer 2013
Friday, October 12, 2012
Inverter shipments to rise sharply in fourth quarter, but falling prices will limit revenue
Monday, September 24, 2012
Taxpayers take it in the shorts for forty million in losses and come out of pocket for the cost of the generators.
September 24, 2012
Today, Chris Bentley, Minister of Energy, issued the following statement:
"I am pleased to announce that an agreement has been reached between the Ontario Power Authority and TransCanada Energy to relocate the proposed 900-megawatt natural gas plant originally planned for Oakville to lands at Ontario Power Generation's Lennox Generating Station site near Bath, in eastern Ontario's Lennox and Addington County.
I would like to thank the OPA, TransCanada and Ontario Power Generation for the work they have done over the past several months to reach this agreement.
The new site will take advantage of existing transmission lines and other infrastructure, as well as the expertise of local workers. The construction of the plant is expected to provide up to 600 construction jobs and approximately 25 permanent jobs.
The total costs that cannot be repurposed at the new site are approximately $40 million. This includes all payments made in relation to the original site, including the cost of engineering design and permits.
The gas turbines originally slated for use at the Oakville plant will be repurposed and used at the Lennox facility. The OPA will purchase the turbines. TransCanada will receive less for the electricity the plant produces than originally agreed upon to offset the cost of the turbine purchase.
The decision not to move forward with the plant at the original Oakville site was made after hearing overwhelming concerns from local residents and local elected officials. We heard concerns from families and we responded.
This afternoon, in response to the Speaker's ruling, we will submit all relevant documents related to the Oakville gas plant, and the cancelled plant in Mississauga, to the Standing Committee on Estimates, and also to both opposition parties.
We said we would release the documents, and sought only to ensure they were not released prematurely, at a time when their release could jeopardize these negotiations at a cost to taxpayers.
Over the coming days and weeks you will read and hear lots of numbers related to the cost of the plant relocation. The only accurate cost to taxpayers for this relocation is $40 million.
Today's relocation announcement helps support Ontario's plan to modernize the province's electricity infrastructure, clean up the air we breathe and end the use of coal by the end of 2014."
Ministry of Energy
Module prices drop again