Tuesday, June 28, 2011

FW: A $286 Billion Play on Japan's Nuclear Fallout: FIT in Japan

 

 

 


From: Energy and Capital <eac-eletter@angelnexus.com>
To: Sposato, Patrick
Sent: Mon Jun 27 13:58:24 2011
Subject: A $286 Billion Play on Japan's Nuclear Fallout

Energy and Capital (images are being
blocked)


Having trouble viewing this issue? Click here.
Refer a Friend to Energy and Capital.

A $286 Billion Play on Japan's Nuclear Fallout

By Jeff Siegel | Monday, June 27th, 2011

It was in 2006, while on a train from Frankfurt to Hanover, that I got my first look at something spectacular.

Although the train was traveling at around 150 mph, it wasn't hard to catch a glimpse of the rows upon rows of rooftop-mounted solar panels that were sucking in the sun's rays and spitting out electrons...

Certainly solar panels were not new to me. But to see this many — in an environment that boasted a solar resource about as strong as what you might find in Portland or Seattle — well, that was definitely not something I expected.

Of course, in 2006, Germany was well into its sixth year of its solar feed-in tariff, a mechanism designed to rapidly integrate solar into the country's energy mix. And boy, did it work...

 

From 2000 to 2010, Germany's installed solar photovoltaic capacity experienced a staggering CAGR of 66 percent.

solarchartThe robust demand for solar was so significant, many believe Germany's aggressive solar agenda is responsible for the global solar bull market we experienced from 2004 to 2008.

There's no doubt nearly every solar manufacturer today exists in its current form as a result of Germany's aggressive solar initiatives.

Of course these days, Germany is in the process of strategically cutting its feed-in tariff. After all, this thing was never intended to run forever. And as a result, solar growth in Germany will slow a bit — although the most recent data indicates it won't be nearly as bad as some would have you believe.

In any event, there's no argument that Germany's solar feed-in tariff allowed for incredible growth... and course dozens of opportunities for investors.

Now, if you weren't playing solar back when the profits were pouring in, don't worry; you may have another chance.

And this time around, the windfall could be even greater.

A $286 Billion Dollar Solar Pay Day

The anti-nuclear movement got a real boost following the Fukushima crisis. There's no doubt about that. And as a result, renewable energy was once again paraded around as one of the many forms of clean energy that could be used to displace any nuclear power that would be phased out in Japan...

Especially solar.

A few months ago, Prime Minister Naoto Kan announced a plan that would put solar panels on about 10 million roofs by 2030. Of course, he gave little details on how such a plan would be funded. But since the announcement, a number of high-level government officials have called for a solar feed-in tariff similar to that of Germany's.

University of Tokyo professor Ryoichi Komiyama recently offered his analysis of the effects of such a tariff, and noted that in a scenario where the country would seek 30 gigawatts of solar, a $261 billion market for solar panel production and installation would be created.

In the case of utility-scale solar, Komiyama added that developers would potentially have to spend an additional $25 billion for about 8 gigawatts of batteries.

As you know, we've long been bullish on utility-scale batteries, particularly in the case of solar. I would even argue that if Japan were to go full force on a solar feed-in tariff, it would be the utility-scale battery players providing the biggest pay day for investors.

You see, of the top five solar panel producers in Japan, only one is a pure play. And that's Suntech Power (NYSE: STP), which is actually the world's largest solar panel producer. If Japan were to implement this feed-in tariff, Suntech would get a huge boost.

Also benefiting from the tariff will be Sharp (PINK SHEETS: SHCAY), Kyocera (NYSE: KYO), Panasonic Corp (NYSE: PC), and Mitsubishi Electric Corp (PINK SHEETS: MIELY).

A Solar Market on Steroids

If Japan were to implement this feed-in tariff, we'll also see an even quicker drop in production costs. As my colleague Nick Hodge pointed out last week, for every doubling of solar manufacturing capacity, production costs fall about 20 percent.

With a Japanese feed-in tariff implemented, you can be sure that solar manufacturing would kick into overdrive with a serious shot of steroids. And consider Japan's energy demands as the world's third largest economy. They're talking about 30 gigawatts of installed solar, or 75 percent of what the entire world installed from 2000 to 2010.

This is a very big deal.

To take it one step further, Japan's environment ministry indicated the potential for commercial solar projects could theoretically reach 150 gigawatts. That's about ten times the capacity of Germany, currently the world's largest solar market.

Of course, it all comes down to how aggressive the Japanese want to be. While there have been dozens of polls showing Japanese consumers want to transition to cleaner forms of power generation, the question is, Will they be willing to pay for it?

I can't imagine Japan's total installed solar reaching 150 gigawatts anytime within the next 20 to 30 years. I just don't think there would be enough political support for it. And I'm pretty sure no matter how much the Japanese despise nuclear right now, they're probably not going to be too willing to pony up any significant increases in their utility bills in order to pay for the integration of 150 gigawatts of solar...

That being said, a temporary feed-in tariff used to get 30 gigawatts installed over the course of 20 years is not out of the question.

And if there's any indication that this tariff will actually get approved, you would be wise to load up on a few solar and utility-scale battery stocks.

We saw what Germany's aggressive feed-in tariff did for solar investors. It essentially launched a solar bull market.

The impact of a similar feed-in tariff in Japan would do the same — but on a much bigger level.

To a new way of life, and a new generation of wealth...

Jeff Siegel Signature 

Jeff Siegel
Editor, Energy and Capital

 

Related Articles

Advanced Battery Technologies

Big Oil Solar Play

A Solar Energy Overview


Collapse 06-030-2011


 

From the Archives...

Members Agree Safety Precautions Must Be Taken
2011-06-24 - Brianna Panzica

Permission For Reserve Tap Requested From Saudi Arabia
2011-06-24 - Brianna Panzica

The Energy War With One Clear Winner
2011-06-24 - Keith Kohl

GE Invests $63 Million in Small Green-Tech Companies
2011-06-23 - Brianna Panzica

IEA Nations to Contribute 60 Million Barrels
2011-06-23 - Brianna Panzica

Economic Releases for the week of Monday, June 27th, 2011:

Jun 27 - Personal Income and Spending
Jun 28 - Case-Shiller 20-city Index
Jun 29 - Pending Home Sales
Jun 30 - Chicago PMI
Jul 01 - Construction Spending
Jul 02 - Auto and Truck Sales
Jun 28 - Consumer Confidence
Jul 01 - Nonfarm Private Payrolls
Jul 01 - Michigan Sentiment
Jul 01 - ISM Index
Jun 29 - MBA Mortgage Index

Brought to you by Wealth Daily


You can manage your subscription and get our privacy policy here.

Energy and Capital, Copyright © 2011, Angel Publishing LLC, P.O. Box 84905, Phoenix, AZ 85071. All rights reserved. No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. While we believe the sources of information to be reliable, we in no way represent or guarantee the accuracy of the statements made herein. Energy and Capital does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. The publisher, editors and consultants of Angel Publishing may actively trade in the investments discussed in this newsletter. They may have substantial positions in the securities recommended and may increase or decrease such positions without notice. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by Xerography, facsimile, or any other means is illegal and punishable by law.

Please note: It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you're getting this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, get more info here, including our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription.

 

Click here to report this email as spam.

No comments: